use Perl

• Judge not lest you be judged (Score:2)

  by brian_d_foy (44)

  Weren't you the guy just taking a big dump on the Chicago.pm list? Why not list all the things that you dump on (including use.perl, which you suggested should be taken over by force)? So, when are you going to stop taking big dumps?
  
  So what if people dump on ideas? It's better than telling people that public debate is forbidden. Perhaps you just don't like open discussion and freedom.
  
  
  • Andy hates freedom (Score:2)

    by petdance (2468) <andy@petdance.com> on 2007.10.12 13:17 (#58307) Homepage Journal

    For anyone else reading this, if you take any of brian's assertions seriously and are concerned about them, please let me know and I'll refute each. Otherwise, I'll let this lie.

    --
    

    --
    xoa

    Reply to This

    Parent

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Aristotle (5147)

      I’d just like links to the relevant archived message so I can form my own opinion.
    • Re: (Score:2)

      by brian_d_foy (44)

      Someone sent me a chat transcript from August 26, although I asked Pudge about this today and he says the suggestion was never that serious:

      michaelschwern: One proposition was for someone to propose to take over maintenance of use.perl from pudge.
      Andy Lester: But all this gets back to my original premise
      Andy Lester: of where are people to do shit?
      michaelschwern: ?
      Andy Lester: OK, so say we in this room says "Let's overhaul use.perl.org"
      Andy Lester: Who's going to do it?

      As for the other thing I mentioned sta
      • Re: (Score:1)

        by sigzero (5768)

        I read the whole thread. Andy's first post was terse but I would not call it a dump and it did foster other talk of which Andy took part and did not dump. I don't see the point here. Not being involved in the Chicago.pm, I would agree with Andy's posts. Especially when you read the second one was created because "Perl lunch" notices were bouncing. After that Andy gave another good suggestion of creating a "social" list for things of that sort under Chicago.pm.
        
        I read it all and I didn't see dumping.
        
        Caveat:
        
        I
      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Ovid (2709)

        OK, I'm very confused. I know and like both you and Andy, so perhaps that doesn't help, but I read that thread and I didn't see any dumping. You have two lists for the Chicago area. Andy doesn't think that makes sense and others disagree. Of course, your definition of "dumping" could be considerably different from my own and even if our definitions were the same, the criteria could be subjective enough that we still couldn't agree.