NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
name suggestion (Score:1)
Uh... What is it? (Score:2)
"Woodstock"? I thought it was an audio related project.
Re:Uh... What is it? (Score:1)
I think the biggest selling point will be that it fixes a lot of design mistakes in Catalyst.
Things like private/public path mapping are not necessary, the way internal forwarding works is completely counter intuitive...
And there is a lot more, especially usability will be weighted very high in Woodstock.
Re:Uh... What is it? (Score:2)
In the same way that Catalyst fixed what you saw as design mistakes in Maypole?
I'm finding it difficult to see the proliferation of Perl frameworks as a good thing. No wonder people see Ruby on Rails as so inviting.
Re:Uh... What is it? (Score:1)
It's a plot to have more wrappers on the CPAN than actual code.
Re:Uh... What is it? (Score:1)
Then you are right, Perl people tend to be quite good at reusing code.
Re:Uh... What is it? (Score:1)
"Actual code" does something beyond implementing the adapter pattern.
Re:Uh... What is it? (Score:1)
Personally, if sri decides he wants to build a framework, that is his business. No?
In Ruby you 1 framework to rule them all. I don't think that is very good at all either.
too subtle (Score:1)
This is a stretch (Score:1)
Ceylon
It's the old school name for Sri Lanka (yes, a play on the username sri), and Sir Lanka just happens to mean "venerable island".
Re:This is a stretch (Score:1)
bsg++
Re:This is a stretch (Score:1)
Re:This is a stretch (Score:1)
Or a toaster that makes tea.
Hmmm (Score:1)
Tempo
Aegis (I kind of like this one; logo could be a shield with a Perl camel)
Agave (Ah gah vey)
Helix
Mojo
Re:Hmmm (Score:1)