NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
perlapp (Score:1)
Something that is on my todo is to learn wxWindows, so I can write stuff that will work on Linux/OS X/Windows. I attempted to learn it once but found the lack of documentation frustrating. I don't really have much of a choice as I've h
Re:perlapp (Score:2)
I have to confess that I also disagree with him from time to time. For example, in his latest article, he writes the following:
On the surface, I agree with that. I was certainly one of those cocksure "I can program anything" types and I faced my comeuppance once I started hanging out at Perl
Re:perlapp (Score:1)
The idea being that in university you pick up your theoretical knowledge, all the concepts and ideas, and have some practical applications of said knowledge (usually in some either ancient or obscure language).
With that knowledge, you can pick up any language.
You then have the joy of adjusting to management who give 'fun' specifications.
Others seem to think that theory is bunk and you become a good programmer merely by doing lots of programming (e.g. many teenagers and/or graphic design people who think HTML is a programming language and that PHP and/or JavaScript are all one needs to program anything; they're often the people who cut'n'paste rather than refactor). This has some merit (after many years of programming in ARM BASIC, I found I'd worked out OO from first principles), but damn if it doesn't take a long time and you're usually not as rounded or well-developed as someone who spent time specifically studying programming as a concept.
---ict / Spoon
Reply to This
Parent