Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • ... that they feel the need to stick it up as a separate card rather than doing continual refactoring. I'd want to work with them on that :-)

    Adrian

    • What if you suddenly wake up an realize you have a large volume of duplicated test code (which may be the case, I have no idea)? Wouldn't you want to schedule time to make a serious difference?

      I think the presence of a card is a very un-sad thing for various reasons (they identified the problem, took action, got on scheduled time for it).

      • Yes. You're right. I was obviously feeling especially grumpy when I wrote that. The presence of the card is certainly a good sign that folk are paying attention to the code and know improvements need to be made. Yay :-)

        That said - I've seen too many folk who get into this nasty cycle of hack-code-until-mud... oh bugger.... better write some refactoring cards.... spend time persuading product owner than they really, _really_ need to do the refactoring cards.... refactor.... hack-code-until-mud... repeat...

        Re