Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • > The CPAN Testers BOF was very positive, as I've noted several thoughts
    > and ideas that were suggested during the discussions. Some might take
    > some time to materialise, while others are more about education and
    > support for testers, some of which is now covered by the launch of the
    > CPAN Testers Wiki. There was even questions relating to PITA, which
    > Adam would have been pleased with.

    So... on one hand we have CPAN Testers, and on the other we have PITA. Every pondered the idea of merging [perl.org]
    • I always thought that was the intention! At least that's what I told everyone :) I was quite pleased in the interest in PITA, because as far as I'm concerned that is the real next phase of CPAN Testers. It's a step up the tool chain, with the benefit of representing many more environments than we do currently.

      There was some discussion around generating and working with VM images to use for CPAN testing, so hopefully some of those involved in the discussions will be checking out your latest posts :)

      • > I always thought that was the intention! At least that's what I told everyone :)

        Well, it is, sort of.

        It's just that there's some elements of CPAN Testers I utterly loath, mostly the reliance on email :)
        • That is likely to change in the future. Adam Foxson has some ideas in that regard :)