NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
RDF is a superior format (Score:1)
The use of RDF as a change format has numerous benefits. A large amount of work has already put into constructing metadata vocabularies in it, which saves us from reinventing a big wheel with some crufty format based on YAML (as acme pointed out [perl.org], YAML is a failed format). RDF is also expressable in different forms: you can take the N3 as linked above and transform it to XML, and then almost everything can read it; or you can apply XSLT to the XML and transform it into something else (like the traditional "Changes" format). It's flexible and powerful.
Reply to This
Re: (Score:2)
I'm also interested in the way microformats solve the RFC pain in XHTML, so that they use a rough standard in CSS class names or link@rel etc. so that we can automatically translate these XHTML into RDF later. Can we take a similar approach to that?