NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
use.perl? Or RT? (Score:2)
--Nat
Re:use.perl? Or RT? (Score:1)
Re:use.perl? Or RT? (Score:2, Informative)
I am a proponent of the RT idea, because it would help me (and probably others) to log into one place and see "HERE are the requests that have been waiting in line longest without a response." As it is at the moment, I would tend to respond to the most recent requests because I can't figure out whether the older ones have been dealt with or not.
Currently the only way to track a
Kirrily "Skud" Robert perl@infotrope.net http://infotrope.net/
Re:use.perl? Or RT? (Score:2)
Another suggestion I would like to make here would be the introduction of a more automated mechanism for introducing existing modules into the module list by their authors - that is to say that alongside the tool to edit the existing entries there could be a list of modules that have been uploaded by the author and not entered on the module list - again I would be quite happy to help with this in some capacity
/J\
Reply to This
Parent