NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Is it really a problem? (Score:2)
I agree, allowing tags to be mutable is silly, but has that actually been a problem for you in practice. I don't recall ever actually modifying the contents of stuff under a tag, and you can always revert it.
As far as the checkout thing goes, that'd be annoying, but I've never done that either. When I want to make a tag I always operate directly on the repo URI:
svn cp http://.../svn/Foo/trunk [...] http://.../svn/Foo/tags/2.0 [...]Yeah, distributed VCS is probably better in lots of ways, but Subversion works well enou
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. The subversion tagging concept is perfectly acceptable because you can always revert them (using "svn revert" or "svn copy -r"), and changing the contents of the tags is unlikely. There are three similar issues with Perl:
Re:Is it really a problem? (Score:1)
And a question to rjbs - I still don't understand why you want to check out the entire Subversion repository. This is usually an indication of poor design. If you want to switch from one branch/tag/trunk to another you can always use "svn switch".
The code all gets checked out to get an atomic commit-and-tag. Without that, you have two transactions.
Yes, that's work-around-able.
It doesn't change the fact that Subversion is a pig or that Subversion's tags are, at best, tolerable. "a tag is a copy" is workable, sure, if you are not crazy and likely to change it. That doesn't change the fact that it's much more annoying than it needs to be. If a tag was name for a revision number, I could check out my "whole" project, which would be the heads of the branches and trunk, and I'd be able to list the tags for quick reference for diffing.
Subversion makes all this annoying and slow.
rjbs
Reply to This
Parent