Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • 3. "Defined or" ($foo // $bar; $baz //= 3) become part of the core.
    "Defined or" is already in 5.9.x.
    --

    --
    "Cake or Death!" .... "Cake please"
    • That makes me happy. I heard it was going to make it into 5.10, so this is nice confirmation. It was also, I hasten to add, the only item on the list that I thought would actually happen.

  • 1. Reetrant regexes : this isn't trivial and needs some effort to understand how the engine works overall. Volunteers welcome.

    2. Are you implicitly saying that the OO model of perl isn't clean ?? ;)

    3. Done :)

    4. Scott Walters suggested recently that making stashes tieable makes it possible to implement method overloading on method signature (for a particular class).

    5. Ain't gonna happen. Patches not welcome, for once.

    • I shan't volunteer for the re-entrant regex fix as my C-fu is weak and when we tell scary stories around the campfire, someone always brings up someone's journey into the regex engine's depths. I'd rather perform a colonoscopy on a flatulent pachyderm.

      It's a shame, though. without reentrant regexes, the utility of (??{}) is severely limited. If it were fixed, we could open up an entirely new class of programming.

      And I would never say that Perl's OO model isn't clean. Why, I just think it's oodles of