Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Re: Will not find happiness 7 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • I apparently did miss it. In fact, I did not even see the word "Bush" in "it". Is the word Bush there in TorgoX's post? Or might TorgoX be concerned about the balance of payments and profligate spending by the US?

    You tell me. Or maybe TorgoX sneakily changed his posting. Maybe I need to check the Google cache.

    Help me here, maybe I missed it.

    And I even looked at the links TorgoX cited, rather than just looking at what he wrote and what he quoted. Mr. Buffett did not appear to use the word "Bush" eit
    • Is it possible that you are putting words into his post that are not there?

      Not only is it possible, it is common [perl.org].

      Might you be a little oversensitive about something?

      You can tell if he yawns or claims you are boring [perl.org] him. (Something that can be done by simply presenting facts)

      And, if you aren't careful, he'll start resorting to personal attacks [perl.org].
      • Not only is it possible, it is common.

        If one is to believe you, yes. But why would anyone do that?

        And, if you aren't careful, he'll start resorting to personal attacks.

        Only if he does first, as happens with you.
        • If one is to believe you, yes. But why would anyone do that?

          I don't expect him to, that is why I provided links. He can determine the facts for himself.

          That is the big difference between you and I.

          I'm willing to provide a basis for my opinion. You make sweeping statements and denigrate those who believe different than you. (Aparently, explaining yourself is more than anyone deserves.) The more the facts differ from your opinion, the more childish your responses become.

          It is no wonder you like the Bush
          • That is the big difference between you and I. I'm willing to provide a basis for my opinion.

            By implying I am not, you -- once again -- lie. I am not willing to provide a basis for my opinion *to you.*

            You make sweeping statements

            So do you. *shrug*

            and denigrate those who believe different than you.

            Only by mere coincidence. I never denigrate someone because they believe differently than I do. I denigrate you because you're a jerk, and I respond in kind.

            The article you complained about in your post ... said nothing about deficit spending. It was about TRADE deficits.

            It's a good thing I didn't mention deficit spending in my post, then, huh? You're not very good at this.

            Care to provide an example?

            To you? Nope.
            • I am not willing to provide a basis for my opinion *to you.*

              So when and why did I start getting such special treatment?

              I just reviewed [google.com] all of our interactions that I could find.

              Everything I could find prior to this calendar year looks fine.

              This calendar year started with this [perl.org], and it has been down hill since.

              In the one thread you managed to call me a liar, then you lied yourself by saying you would never respond to me again. Which you have done repeatedly.

              To me, that seems to be the point that things
              • This calendar year started with this, and it has been down hill since.

                Yes, one of your many posts full of lies.

                And you think this makes you look *good*?
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.