NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Additional thoughts on "branding" Perl (Score:1)
Sad to hear that the branding exercise turned out so poorly (though not entirely surprising). I suspect that any attempt to work with a marketing agency that is not focused on marketing technology is going to result in something similar.
There's also lots to be said about the " pinko marketing [pbworks.com]" approach, for brands that have such a huge user community: i.e., marketing from the bottom-up vs. top-down.
I jotted down some thinking on the "branding Perl" question in a recent blog post: "Getting to the root of P [newint.org]
Keeping technology simple since 2003
Re: (Score:2)
I really like the post you linked to and some of the responses. I can agree with the message. Back when I sold cars, I learned a couple of interesting things. First, selling Japanese cars was hard because I didn't give a damn about cars. Customers came in armed with invoice price lists, Consumer Reports, news articles, etc. They really were focused on value. When I switched to selling American cars, many people came in to "buy American" and while the cars were demonstrably a lesser value -- 3 versus 5
Re: (Score:1)
I must admit, I also like the "Creative power" messaging also. For me it's reminiscent of "Making Easy Things Easy and Hard Things Possible" -- which has always resonated for me when thinking about Perl's strengths.
But that "creative power" message is probably aimed squarely at developers, and not business executives. And that's where I was going in the post referenced above: There could be -- and probably should be -- different messaging to each potential audience. For developers, Perl is "creative power
Keeping technology simple since 2003