NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
easy to pin down too.
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:1)
The first name is without a doubt Italian but the second seems to be Spanish.
Perhaps it isn't a conspiracy. Perhaps they voted in reaction to Randal's vote.
I think that a one star rating on all the modules was unfair. They should have been rated on their usefulness, implementation or efficacy. Instead they were downrated to make a point. That was unworthy.
John.
--
Reply to This
Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:2)
However, if I could find a way to simply delete my 1-star ratings (which apply only to an outdated version), I would. I have not found any way to do that though.
I think arbitrary five-star ratings are clearly an abuse of the system though.
Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:2)
Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:1)
> They're also highly unmaintainable,
I can assure you: I am maintaining my modules just *perfectly*. The day I will need a maintainer, I will edit that style as needed, (or I will find a more flexible maintainer)
> because they use a style of indentation that truly is a mistake.
It may be difficult to read the first time because you are not use to it, and this is a con, but other people use it for the many pros you can find here:
http://perl.4pro.net/perlish_coding_style.html [4pro.net]
and since perl d
Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:1)