NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Definitely... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Catulus (Score:2)
Indeed, Isidorus Hispalensis in his medieval encyclopaedia, "Etymologia
Re:Catulus (Score:1)
Interesting about the Etymologiae. I actually discussed the puppy/generic animal issue to some extent in my one and only journal post [perl.org] to date. The Etymologiae may have been referenced in the Thesaurus, but (O irony) my Latin is sufficiently rusty that I was having trouble reading the full entry.
It is certainly true that "catulus" especially referred to puppies in the classical period (c.f. Lewis & Short), but I would argue that Isidore's pedantry shows us that the meaning of the word *was* shifting. Isidore, like a good proto-classicist and linguistic prescriptivist, would have wanted to nip such lazy language use in the bud; what set him apart from an actual classicist is that he was happy to contradict such authorities as Virgil, Pliny, and Phaedrus to do so. I, like any good medievalist / Byzantinist, am happy to accept the later meaning of "cattus" and, by extension, "catulus".
All that said, I'd say that "catulofelicide" is probably the best of our options. It has that quality of acceptability to both the purist classicist and the laissez-faire medievalist. It definitely has better prosody than "feliculicide", and will better accommodate Nick's iniquitous needs by virtue of sounding more complicated, technical, and just plain satisfying than "catulicide".
Reply to This
Parent