NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Perl6 on Perl5 (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
There have been a few. None turned out to be maintainable.
Management vs Implementation (Score:1)
There is the implementation side of a project, and there is the strategic side of a project.
Many many projects screw up at a strategic level because, frankly, their management sucks.
CPAN as a whole tends to get it right, specifically because it makes no assumptions about how the code should be managed (only how it is released) and the permissions model allows for people to take over modules easily when the original
Re: (Score:1)
A management problem lurks in that as well, however. Do you vet contributors such that they assign you some sort of copyright or perpetual license to the code they write? I squawked about the potential release of Pugs into the public domain for several reasons. One was my potential legal liability as a contributor.