use Perl

• I agree with you... (Score:1)

  by sigzero (5768)

  I just didn't understand how it was hipocracy for someone to be "gay" but still think that "family values" and marriage should not be same sex.

  They try and come off as the "we tolerate anyone" crowd but they only do that when you agree with their position. The blogs on election night were filled with people that have no idea how to hold a logical argument. You are against "gay" marriage so therefore you are like the Taliban. You base your beliefs on the Bible so therefore you are just as bad as radical mu
• First of all... (Score:2)

  by rjray (1649)

  The person Maher "outed", that wasn't news. His sexuality has been an "open secret", with pundits often referring to him as a "closet heterosexual".

  Secondly, outing is, in my opinion, justified when the person is virulently anti-gay. For example, the recent bombshell of "Pastor Ted" Haggard in Colorado Springs. 100% justifiable. If you are building your mega-church empire largely on the demonization of gays and lesbians, and meanwhile you're getting "massages" from a male prostitute, then outing is a prett

  --
  

  --rjray
  • Re: (Score:2)

    by pudge (1)

    The person Maher "outed", that wasn't news. His sexuality has been an "open secret", with pundits often referring to him as a "closet heterosexual".
    
    Well, first, I know it has been rumored, but most people had never heard it before.
    
    Second, it is simply not a matter of fact that Mehlman is gay. There's no evidence of it. At all. Anywhere. It is merely speculation. (Caveat: it could be that some evidence has arisen recently that I've not heard; but I've known about this rumor for a couple of years, and ha
    • Re: (Score:1)

      by sigzero (5768)

      Very good answer. I was going to give one but you seem to have convered it.