NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Not sure the Steelers were the better team (Score:1)
On the push-off in the end zone, I agree that by the absolute letter of the law, it was a penalty. However, officiating is done in the spirit of the law and I've seen the same play plenty of times when it wasn't called. The written rule doesn't mean as much when it is inconsistently enforced. In this case, I don't think they should have called it because I don't think the push matt
Re:Not sure the Steelers were the better team (Score:2)
*shrug* They followed the rules. They rules are the game. I see no problem.
In this case, I don't think they should have called it because I don't think the push mattered that much.
That it mattered at all should be enough. That said, if it didn't matter, why did he do it? I see no reasonable complaint here.
There was another bad call on a phantom chop block when Hasselbeck tackle
Re:Not sure the Steelers were the better team (Score:2)
I'll mention that to the 1972 US Olympic Basketball Team.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Not sure the Steelers were the better team (Score:2)
Implicit in my comments is that no one is cheating. I, along with many others, am convinced the officials cheated to give the USSR more chances to win. But even if you aren't, the point is that the 1972 U.S. Olympic Basketball Team certainly is so convinced, and so they would see the notion of "best team wins" doesn't apply to their case.