Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Strawberry Perl Update 3 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Not true.

    I'd say that the Strawberry Perl distro is much better than ActiveState (I almost said "vastly", but that would be unfair).

    AS is bearable if you have Visual Studio installed, and know a few extra PPM repos that you routinely set up on new machines.

    But when I tried out Vanilla and Strawberry Perl I was pleasantly surprised. Things just... worked! I had less problems installing some things on Windows than on Ubuntu (how. about. that!).

    If this experience can be verified by other Windows users (and I
    • The thing is, if you have pure-Win32 programmers that never touch Unix, they tend to be using Visual Studio and so on already. They have a familiarity with Visual Studio and the Win32 ways of working,

      In this environment, the better and less confusing environment for them does seem to be ActiveState.
      • I've found the opposite. I use Visual Studio.NET at $work, all day, every day so I'd consider that being a pure win32 programmer. But that's now in the age of .NET, where you don't have to know a lick of C to do real things, like http modules, services, etc.

        Back in the Visual Studio 6 days, one could compile a perl module [mod_perl.. oi] even if you didn't know C [as painful as it may have been to get studio to play along], and you could be fairly certain that the modules would work just fine.

        When .NET 1.0,
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.