Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • I think you're reading way too much into why a company would like you to sign a NDA. What it says is "we'd like you to do some work for us, but we wouldn't like you to blabber about it with our competitors".

    I don't find that unreasonable.
    • Scottie is right that siging an NDA before an interview is a huge warning sign that says several things, none of which is good :
      • 'lawyers are more important than programmers here'
      • 'Our ideas are more valuable than yours'
      • 'We do not trust you'
      • 'When you work here you cannot open source any of the work you do and we will own any ideas that you have at work or at home'

      This isn't always the case, but an NDA before an interview shows that they are all likely and so the company is best avoided.

      There is a pla


      @JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
      print reverse @JAPH;
      • In this case, the company is a startup. I do not find it unreasonable for that company to want to keep whatever they are doing private until such time they deem appropriate.

        However, I am glad he pulled his application since I am going for the same position(s). : )

        • I've worked for several startups, in each case they were capable of a) trusting me and b) providing appropriate information for the interview.

          The employment contract itself contained an NDA, which is fairly normal and certainly acceptable.

          I've always found that people with 'trust issues' like this are usually less trustworthy themselves.

          I would certainly think twice about accepting an NDA for an interview.


          @JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
          print reverse @JAPH;
          • by sigzero (5768) on 2005.03.27 23:44 (#39189) Journal
            I did actually. I talked to a couple of friends that are also doing similiar things. I signed it for a couple of reasons. I want to work with Perl professionally. I like the fact that it will be a mentoring type position. I can still say "no" after the interview. If it was an established company I may not have signed it. It is a startup and my take is that they are being paranoid about whatever ideas they have. I can't say I fault them for that. I don't fault Scott either. He made the choice he thinks is right and for his own reasons. More power to him.
            • I think you missed my point entirely. First, I absolutely busted my ass for several startups, one after another, during the dot com rush. I'm not eager to work unnecessarily hard agian. I'm too old and tired. I don't mind working hard, but trying to save a struggling company with a super-human effort is for younger folks. So when I decide I don't want to work for a company, it's because I'm avoiding this situation. And the companies that seem to find themselves in this situation tend to be the ones that ask
              • "my article was only my opinion of why this correlation exists"

                I thought I said that too. Maybe I wasn't as clear as I should have been when answering.

                Of course, I could have missed the point entirely. That has been known to happen from time to time. : )