Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Perl::Critic and Module::Checkstyle More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Re: Perl::Critic and Module::Checkstyle (Score:1)

by thaljef (6477) on 2005.11.29 23:20 (#44914) Homepage

So what kind of differences did you notice between the two? Do they give conflicting or compelmentary results? Do you have any thoughts on how these types of modules should work. As the author of Perl::Critic, I'm just curious to see what other people think. Thanks for your feedback. -Jeff

Reply to This
- Re: Perl::Critic and Module::Checkstyle (Score:2)
  
  by jonasbn (1153)
  
  Well I should do a more thorough analysis, recommending any of the two :)
  
  Anyway I see the two modules having to different scopes.
  
  Where Perl::Critic is focused on the well defined set of best practices from the book 'Perl Best Practices', Module::CheckStyle is more general - and can be configured into applying a check for any styleguide, which makes it more interesting in conjunction with for example a company coding guideline, perhaps even PerlStyle. I actually asked Claes to let the module implement PerlSt

Get More Comments

Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.