NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Writing off .NET (Score:4, Insightful)
Among the big goals for .NET was the idea of a "common language runtime". I can see the need for bridging a compiled language and a dynamic language in the same project, but I can't see the need for multiple dynamic languages in one project/application, or contorting many languages into the moral equivalent of C# with differently flavored syntactic sugar.
Most of the benefit that .NET promises is available today (and was available 3-5 years ago) as web services (XML-RPC, SOAP, REST, roll-your-own, or UltraOmniSuperHypedML). That's attacking the same problem from a different direction, and it is gaining a lot more adoption, mindshare and traction. No, it's not pretty, but it is functional, and it is here and solving problems today.
Even the .NET webloggers on oreillynet admit that there may not be a good reason to use .NET today, unless you're rewriting an existing project and want to take advantage of some new whiz-bang feature.
Reply to This