NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
they are working (Score:1)
And according to Scott Ritter, who was the chief inspector for UNSCOM from 1991-1998 inspections
Re:they are working (Score:2)
That is false. Inspections require unconditional and complete cooperation. This is absolutely clear from the UN resolutions. Please read them. If there is not complete cooperation, inspections are definitionally not working. There is no grey area. It is a delightful fancy, but it is not reality.
Nation after nation recognizes that inspections are not working. France and Germany are basically the only significant holdouts.
Even Kofi Annan, just last week, said that the UN must take additional action to disarm Iraq, that a new resolution is probably going to be necessary. He would not have said this if inspections were working. The only reason we would need another resolution is if the current resolutions -- which define the nature of the inspections regime -- are not working.
As to your alternative: it says nothing about disarmament. I asked for alternatives for disarmament. I am unconcerned with something that does not address the mandate for disarmament.
Reply to This
Parent