NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Your career isn't a good enough reason (Score:2)
I've been talking to a lot of people about this recently, and I usually ask the question "Why do you care if Perl survives?". Most people say the same thing that you say at the end of your post: "Our careers depend on it."
I think that's a pretty poor reason to do anything, and certainly the worst of all the reasons to promote a programming language. If we're in a situation where we are merely trying to save jobs and keep Perlers employed, we're not doing the right thing.
Re:Your career isn't a good enough reason (Score:2)
Ouch! You're perfectly correct. I was trying to come up with a vaguely punchy ending and dropped the ball. Thanks for calling me on that.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you think it is not a good enough reason?
I thought that the sentence Your career depends on it perfectly fits my situation and probably that of many others so I was wondering why do you think it is not an acceptable reason to invest in the future of Perl?
I am quite sure if I could not make a living any more using Perl I could switch to something else. It will certainly take many years to gain some reputation and I might even need to take a salary cut because of that but I would find m
Re: (Score:1)
Hi Folks
Because companies which hire me don't hire me to promote my career! Surely that's obvious.
They hire me because they have a code to be written, I'm available, and either they want Perl or (rarely) they let me choose Perl.
Again, for /them/, my career does not come in to it.
So, we need to promote Perl so more people automatically see Perl as the best language to provide a solution.
Cheers
Re: (Score:2)
The reason why "your career isn't a good enough reason" can possibly be explained by again casting things in a slightly different light. Imagine if we saw this posting:
The obvious reply is that this is a very self-serving statement which ignores the reality that COBOL is an antiquated language that needs to die. Companies are turning to older COBOL programmers because young people don't want to le [itworld.com]