Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by pudge (1) on 2004.10.06 20:38 (#35011) Homepage Journal
    Also note how there is an Ottawa Senators, but it is not the same as the previous Ottawa Senators. So there's precedent not just for the act of taking an old name for a new franchise, but there's precedent for taking THAT old name for a new franchise. :-)
    • Right, but there's still the Ottawa Senators and the Ottawa Senators, just like there were the Washington Senators and the Washington Senators (and the Cleveland Browns and the Cleveland Browns). But having a new team called the Washington Senators that is neither the Washington Senators nor the Washington Senators sounds like an Abbot and Costello bit. Sort of like the Roughriders and the Roughriders in the CFL, or naming every football team in Australia "Bruce".

      Let's just forget about it and just call