NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Total Communication Failure (Score:2)
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:2)
DDJ says they are still going to buy Perl articles, but that their budget is done across the board. They have to spread that out over all "lightweight languages" (whatever that means) I pretty much knew this was coming from talking to my editor over there.
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:1)
I imagine by lightweight they mean Perl, Ruby, Tcl, PHP and the like.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:2)
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:1)
I am not sure "how" they would classify but I am sure anything in the scripting realm would be lightweight.
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:2)
These languages tend to be semantically and syntactically more complex and take up more resources than other languages. They are also more powerful and expressive. There's really nothing light about them.
In keeping with the spirit of the word "lightweight", the language would probably need to be confined in scope and restricted in syntax. It wouldn't be a general purpose programming language, either, sin
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:1)
I am known a few C/C++ that view Perl as as lightweight language.
I guess it's a case of Language Religion?
However, I kind of figured TPJ was going to go belly up when I heard Dobbs bought them. Didn't seem like a good fit to me.
Oh well time to buy TPR
Re:Total Communication Failure (Score:2)