NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Heh (Score:1)
Re:Heh (Score:2)
Right now it's Osama 2, US 1. Sure, we got the bombs, but unfortunately there's no equivalence between civilians and al Qaeda or else we'd definitely be on top. All we've managed to do is break the terror network into fragments (or "cells" as they are known in the arg
Re:Heh (Score:1)
None of this is bupkis. Of course, every single one of these achievements has a downside, either in terms of what hasn't been done or can't be done or what might yet happen. So, should we have done nothing at all? Or perhaps was there some feat of diplomacy or war that would have done more?
I.e. OK, now al Q. operates underground. Which they did in all countries other than Afghanistan prior to the counter-bombing campaign. At least now, their central heirarchy is weakened if not eradicated, and they no longer have an open base for training. Was there something that could've been done to eradicate the organization, cells and all, by now? Did Rumsfeld or someone else blow an opportunity?
Reply to This
Parent