Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • ...and then there's polls.

    I'd like it if someone would post, verbatum, what it was we voted on that day. I remember it being worded very, very, very weakly. Something along the lines of "Do you think we should investigate developing a Perl certification?" ie. something you really couldn't vote against. It certainly wasn't a strong message for certification and I don't like seeing it spun that way.
    • During and after OSCON, I asked Damian and others about the details of the vote, to check my recollections, and they agreed with me that the first question was "How many are against the development of a certification program", and the second, "How many are for the development of a certification program". (Damian asked the questions.) And given the context of the preceding discussion, it would have been clear that we were talking about the Perl community developing the program.

      All the panelists (along with

      --

      Dr. Tim Maher
      CEO, Consultix
      Perl and UNIX Training [teachmeperl.com]
      • Well, I was one of the folks who raised hands to the "for" question, but my diary notes that the question was:

        "How many of you are for continued discussion, and possible development, of a certification program by the Perl community?"

        and I also remarked that it's hardly possible to vote against such a wording. Again, my comprehension ability for spoken English may be at fault, but I remember several people who expressed similar sentiments about the wording.

        • Hi Autrijus, thanks for your contribution. I remember you were sitting in the front row, in the aisle seat, and taking lots of notes.

          As I indicated, I was unsure of the exact wording myself, which is why I asked others about their recollections. Anyway, I didn't remember it* quite the way your notes have it, but I'm willing to accept your version (although it's just occurred to me that Nat video-taped the whole session, so we could potentially find out for sure from an examination of that record).

          Anyway

          --

          Dr. Tim Maher
          CEO, Consultix
          Perl and UNIX Training [teachmeperl.com]
          • So we can still conclude that most people are either still open to the idea of certification, or already in favor of it.

            No, we can't.

            First, I refute your assumption that the ~200 people in the room were a representative sample. The attendance at OSCon represents a small fraction of the community. Some would say an insignificant and completely unrepresentative fraction of the Perl community. And 200 attendees for one talk represents a minority of the attendees at OSCon. It means that there were 20

            • I'm shocked that you would defame me in a public forum, but just to show what a reasonable guy I am, I will nonetheless address the issues you've raised.

              1) You have no better insight into the demographics of the 200 people who attended the TPC Panel Discussion than I do. So my guess is as good as yours, and we may both still be wrong.

              2) I've always taken care to seek additional input regarding my impressions of what happened at the conference from others who were present, and I've always done my best t

              --

              Dr. Tim Maher
              CEO, Consultix
              Perl and UNIX Training [teachmeperl.com]
              • I'm shocked that you would defame me in a public forum [...]

                No, I am calling you accountable for the misleading statements you have made repeatedly about the "vote" certification panel at OSCon. Apparently, you agree that your representations may have been less than forthright:

                [I]f indeed I've mischaracterized the results of the vote, as seems likely given the recent clarification of the questions, I'm truly sorry.

                On the issue of the panelists:

                [W]e were a group of 5, and 2 were pro, and the o

                • You need to look up "forthright" in your dictionary. I've never said that my representations were less than "candid" or "straightforward"; on the contrary, I did my very best to correctly report on the events that transpired at the OSCON discussion, and I took pains to verify my facts in advance. However, despite these measures, it seems that my informants and I may have gotten the phrasings of the questions wrong, which may cast the results in a different light. Once we get the "audio recording" of the session to confirm the actual phrasing, we'll know more.
                  --

                  Dr. Tim Maher
                  CEO, Consultix
                  Perl and UNIX Training [teachmeperl.com]