Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Absolutely! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jordan (120) on 2003.10.31 11:57 (#25346) Homepage Journal
    • While we admittedly do some strange things in tests (I override function definitions left and right), for the most part, good software practices apply to tests because tests are software.

    I couldn't agree more.

    Being an ardent advocate of TDD, I wouldn't think of writing a line of test software before I have the tests for that test software in place. Of course, the test-tests are also software and require that tests for them be written first and those tests require that tests, well you get the idea.

    • The nice part about TDD is that the tests test the code and the code tests the test. That is, if you write a test, make sure it fails, write the code, make sure it passes, you can avoid most of the worry.

      Writing a good test library is harder, though.