NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
BBEdit (Score:1)
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
I don't know where to start, it's all wrong! No tabs! No good at configurable indenting! Many many other things! And the HTML heritage bears heavily...
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
BBEdit is not perfect, but it is the best editor out there, bar none.
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
When I tried it half the menus were covered with HTML-related stuff. Perhaps that's changed, and perhaps they can be removed. It doesn't give a first good impression. On second impression, I found a shortage of shortcuts to navigate around text. Again, probably configurable but points to a more mouse-oriented approach which I dislike (a general reproach for most things Mac it would seem -- I tend to expect at the very least Ctrl-arrow, Ctrl-Shift-arrow, Ctrl-Backspace-arrow, Ctrl-Del-Arrow where "arrow"
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
You may have been using Bizarro BBEdit
A good 1/4 - 1/3 of the Preferences are related to HTML, but those can be ignored if you don't use it for HTML.
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
The strict minimum I need for text navigation is:
I've probably forgot a few, but witho
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
Some of them may not be supported by Mac OS standards or by BBEdit's basic functionality, but BBEdit also has an emacs mode, where it supports all emacs key commands
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
Yes, I didn't say there were none of them! Default win/lin OS settings don't have enough to my taste either (I tend to want to use those anywhere I can type text in). Thankfully Textpad and Kate solve that nicely.
I saw that Qt/Mac was just release (yay!). I'll see if I can get Kate running after work :)
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
I am saying that with emacs mode turned on, I am fairly certain ALL of them are supported.
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
Yes, but then I never managed to remeber how many chickens to sacrifice... I have a terrible memory like that.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
They're all consistent, using always the same modifiers combination (and only Ctrl and Shift), with "obvious" special keys arrows, end, home, pg-up, pg-down, and backspace, del.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
Besides, with Exposé in Mac OS X 10.3, you won't need tabs.
Re:BBEdit (Score:2)
Yeah, those tabs :) I can't live without tabs. No tabs means not an option. I've looked at Exposé, it does look like it'll help for a lot of the misery I feel switching between windows on OS X, but it ain't like tabs. I don't want to see lots of miniatures of the stuff I'm editing (especially as I often have several dozen files open simultaneously), I want to see little tabs with a title so that I can tab through them!
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Just rumor? (Score:2)
Re:Just rumor? (Score:2)
I'm downloading Eclipse right now, but I'm told it's useless below 512mo :-/ I hadn't thought of CodeWarrior, thanks, looking now.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Why not Emacs? (Score:3, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:Why not Emacs? (Score:2)
Well I'm usually pretty fast at learning stuff. I tried to get to work with emacs three times (including last week). After two hours I can vaguely remember how to get around and do a few basic things. The next day it's gone no matter what.
It simply won't get in. Whoever's idea that is of a usable interface doesn't come from my planet :)
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Why not Emacs? (Score:2)
Yes, Emacs takes a bit to get familar. But once you're there... it's an amazing tool.
Re:Why not Emacs? (Score:2)
Well I picked up Perl a *lot* faster ;) I don't doubt that it may be an amazing tool, I just don't happen to have three spare weeks with nothing else to do :-/ A text editor should be easy to pick up. I don't care if I have to struggle to fine tune it later, but the basics should be so that at least I can start using it before I know more.
And that's how it differs from Perl: "baby emacs" is already way too hard.
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Why not Emacs? (Score:2)
- ask (emacs user)
-- ask bjoern hansen [askbjoernhansen.com], !try; do();
Re:Why not Emacs? (Score:2)
Yes, I can use vi(m), but I have other reasons for disliking it ;) I guess I'll just wait for Trolltech to release Qt/Mac (any minute now) and see if that's enough to get Kate working...
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Simple option (Score:2)
Thanks, I'll try that despite the scary eXtreme Programming stickers over there ;)
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Kate for MacOS X (Score:2)
Yes, but that requires X+KDE+Qt+Kate, eventually I may do that but I need to get started and not to spend three days installing software ;) Thanks!
-- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]
Re:Kate for MacOS X (Score:2)
I don't know if that means you will be able to compile KDE+Qt+Kate without any intervening X bits, but it's certainly a start.