Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • It's odd that you would "REALLY agree with" something that's so wrong. ;-)

    The most egregious statement it makes is entirely false: the U.S. has not, in any way, criminalized public dissent. That statement is indefensible, unless it means "criminalized" sociologically, instead of a legally.

    As to secret tribunals and "shooting first" (pre-emptive strikes?), these are nothing new to the 226-year history of the USA. Secret tribunals are rare, but not illegal, and not new. And pre-emptive strikes to prevent