NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
To be expected: Alpha version. (Score:1)
I mean, really. Cygwin Git is functional since long ago. MinGW Git is _not even in any official release_. You did not even bother to research that.
But I guess that is to be expected, as it is to be expected that Windows users will _never_ help to improve on the programs they want to use.
I see git gui improving day by day. I see MinGW Git improving day by day. And I see _nothing_ coming from Windows users.
But then it al
Re: (Score:1)
Firstly, I couldn't care less about cygwin. I've had enough problems with it over the years that I simply am not going to use it. There's too much pain there.
As for not researching, I'm quite aware this isn't a mainline release. I noticed that from the fact the download URI was from some third-party URI.
Further, it DOES suck,
Re: (Score:1)
It is _known_ that it lacks bash and perl, for example, and Git is not usable without bash and perl for the moment. It is not even a proof-of-concept git, but a proof-of-concept installer.
It's as if you would take an architect's model of a house and complain that it is so small that you cannot live in there.
So no, there is no excuse that you tested the installer. None at all.
T
Re: (Score:1)
Up until that point I'd been told that there wasn't a native Win32 version to test, and so there was no need to do anything.
I'd be happy to amend the review from "git sucks on native win32" to "there is not git available for native Win32".
Unless you have something else I should look at?
Re: (Score:1)
But. I want something in return.
See, I am not really interested in the spread of Git. I am interested in making it more usable, mainly for myself. I am not at all interested in working for free.
So if you want me to work for you, you have to compensate me somehow. One possibility: you maintain a graphical installer for Windows. Another, you become eternal tester.
If you do not want to give me so
Re: (Score:1)
Perl is looking for a new version control system.
Git is competing with several other choices, most notably svn.
It's not up to US to make those competitors work properly on other operating systems.
They simply get examined on their existing merits, debated, and eventually something will be chosen.
And as you might have noticed with the Firefox people, who had to make the same decision, if git is not competitive for that user group, it will lose.
The only decision for the ver
Re: (Score:1)
You are free to chose anything else, and frankly, given the way you tested Git, I suggest you do.
I asked myself for a very short moment what you would have said if I tested an alpha version of a Perl installer, which is not supposed to run on Windows 98, and then complained loudly on my blog that Perl sucks. But it was only a short moment. I don't really care. Promised. My last word on this.
Re:To be expected: Alpha version. (Score:1)
> tested an alpha version of a Perl installer, which is not supposed to
> run on Windows 98, and then complained loudly on my blog that Perl
> sucks.
Dammit, baited.
http://vanillaperl.com/files/strawberry-perl-5.8.8-alpha-2.exe [vanillaperl.com]
Go nuts
Reply to This
Parent