NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Tilly (Score:3, Informative)
My new Monks voting strategy is to locate one Tilly post I haven't voted on a day and upvote it. I'm kind of hoping others are doing the same. It's not much, but I get the feeling he doesn't want anything too vocal done about it.
------------------------------
You are what you think.
Re:Tilly (Score:2, Funny)
I wonder what on earth his tormentors think they can gain. Do they plan to try to sell the patches he made to Exporter? Ridiculous!
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Tilly (Score:3, Funny)
Okay, it's not a *big* sacrifice. Still, I'm showing someone.
Sean, you can drop a huge pile of deprecated FILEHANDLE slots on them.
Re:Tilly (Score:1)
But is it possible to get the company name, start an 'Open-Crusade' ?
Companies PAY to get good relation, let just make this company loose as much reputation as possible.
AFAIK, telling a company is not fair isn't a crime, tell it everywhere to every programmer, find every LEGAL way to bug them
(Hope they respected all open-licence term is they use open source product (and they did as Tilly use Perl))
What about ditributed SPAM (If I send a mail telling them how bad it is it's
Re:Tilly (Score:1)
Although, for the life of me I can't see why you would even want to do this. This company is not hurting anyone. Leave them be.
Re:Tilly (Score:1)
I may seem to overreact, but as a (ex?)perlmonks regular,
I've learnt a lot from Tilly.
I REALLY mean a lot.
I was hurted, beccause I won't benefit from his wise advices...
And reading the answer to his post on perlmonks, I was not the only one...
Furthermore according to the tone of his posts, I don't think he was in a pleasant situation.
(Are you sure he wasn't hurted ?)
Finally, the Perl community was hurted, for this company prevents one of its active member to c
Re:Tilly (Score:1)
The lesson here is not that some companies are Bad -- if anything, by allowing his existing code created under contract to remain free this company is being Good, not Bad, and should be applauded, not criticized
Re:Tilly (Score:3, Interesting)
Furthermore, it feels as though it sets a precedent. "Eh, we shoved Ben Tilly out of Perl. If any of those other Perl people starts talking intellectual property, we'll threaten them too." Smacks of censorship, if you're prone to extremes (like me).
------------------------------
You are what you think.