NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
perlxstut ? (Score:2)
Re:perlxstut ? (Score:1)
It seems to have one more example. Incidentally it's one dealing with filehandles which is what I will need very soon. That's certainly an improvement!
But the Typemap section is still too thin. It still does not mention the special symbols $var, $arg and $type. I'd love to be able to say
perldoc perltypemapand get a concise description of what a typemap file is really fRe:perlxstut ? (Score:2)
Re:perlxstut ? (Score:1)
It was only yesterday that I had my first succesful use of a typemap (which was actually copied from Dean Roehrich). A little too thin yet for supplying documentation.
But I am not at all lazy when it comes to Perl and I'll be the first one to write such a beast if I feel ready. I expect to gain some familiarity with all that soon. Also, when looking at the typemaps available I see a slightly different subset of macros and functions from the perlapi to the ones I have used so far (just this morning I realized that I had no idea how to turn a glob-ref into a PerlIO thing; now I know [btw:
sv_2iois unmentioned in perlapi]).Therefore I am quite confident that the typemap experience will close some gaps I am still suffering from.
Reply to This
Parent