NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Not to mention... (Score:1)
You're forced to endure the "umm.."s and "uhhh..."s that are naturally edited out of text.
Audio is sequentially accessed so you can't just skip down by paragraphs because someone is prattling on about something you're not interested in.
The visual cues from even decent writers are missed. Paragraphs to separate related ideas, bullet lists for lists of gripes... True that some cues can be transmitted through audio, but to me those are much more vague without an accompanying face.
Audio is of inconsistant q
Natural Language (Score:1)
Just because Perl is designed with natural language principles in mind does not make it a beautiful spoken language. :)
shut up... (Score:2)
I would rather read than listen.
Audioblogging would be ok if it was edited and otherwise munged. With written blogging there is a little a minimum level of editing that occurs between brain and fingers. Heck, there might even be some editing done after the fingers have done their work. How much editing is down in audioblogging after it is spoken?
Text, Audio and Video (Score:2)
just because it's hip and popular... (Score:3, Funny)
doesn't mean that everyone wants to listen to the cheeky kiwi wanker who should be writing instead of yammering a stream of consciousness onto the net about his huge pr0n collection and secret lust for wearing women's lingerie :) Don't add more noise to the noise of the net.
Reply to This
Re:just because it's hip and popular... (Score:3, Funny)
--Nat
Re:just because it's hip and popular... (Score:2)
Rating required (Score:1)
Re:Rating required (Score:1)