NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
help them think they understand.
--Larry Wall
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I have some context (Score:1)
The average rating was 3.96. Apparently nobody got a truly stellar rating.
So I clearly have some room for improvement. But not a bad starting point given my material, the length, and my lack of experience speaking.
I can't say I'm really happy with that result, but I'm not overly depressed over it either.
Re: (Score:2)
At the very least, you got feedback. I never found out anything about my "Logic Programming in Perl" talk. I suspect it wouldn't have been too terribly good as I'm hardly a Damian or Dominus and it was a rather esoteric topic.
The past is the past :) (Score:2)
Don't worry about the comments too much. You'll do better next time. :)
The harshest comments come from people who have odd expectations that are totally beyond your control. A few people didn't like my Mastering Perl tutorial because it covered the same topics as the book. I'm not sure why they think I would leave stuff out of the book, or why a class of the same title as the book given by the author of the book would be that different.
Note the you should see two numbers in your evaluation: one for your tal
Re: (Score:1)
Huh. People on average thought exactly the same of the presentation and of me. But different people thought differently of me and the presentation.
How I did... (Score:1)
4.4 here, which I'm told is pretty good.
Only the damianesk keynotes get the really high scores though.
Comments, on the other hand, weren't very useful, as they didn't really add anything.