NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Re: Back to Books (Score:1)
Well, the 2nd edition of the French translation of the camel book only sold 6600 copies. But O'Reilly France [editions-oreilly.fr] still wanted us to translate it [editions-oreilly.fr].
And we insisted to add a special paragraph written by grinder [perl.org] (leader of Paris.pm) in the introduction, which tells the readers about "Les Mongueurs de Perl [mongueurs.net]", so that they know where to ask for help in French. I guess this is part of making people aware of the existence of th
Re: Back to Books (Score:1)
Most books could withstand a standard half page advert for the community, and seeing as O'Reilly have made great efforts on behalf of Perl, I'm sure it's something they would consider.
Cookbooks (Score:1)
Where have these people learned their Perl from? From hacking other people's scripts, downloading examples and fiddling with them probably.
People are too busy to read books. This has to be done now and we haven't got time for you to read the camel first. Download an example, hack at it, and get it in place.
Maybe what we need is more cookbook type books after all, rather than more tutorial type books. Books for people that don't want to have to read the entire thing but just grab the book when
Re:Cookbooks (Score:1)
That having been said, it would be extremely informative (plus, it would play to the "We need it now!" audience) to see a book that presents a case study of using old code for a new solution. "We needed to solve Q problem. First thing, we went to CPAN. Here's where CPAN is..." and then explained how to use/modify/twist previously-written code. (Even
------------------------------
You are what you think.
Re:Cookbooks (Score:3, Funny)
_Stealing Perl_, obviously
Re:Cookbooks (Score:1)
:)
--
DO NOT LEAVE IT IS NOT REAL.
Pessimistic but probably right (Score:2, Insightful)
People who are interested in learning more are rare. Those that want to will, those that don't won't and it is hard to change this. This is not just for Perl but covers nearly everything they do. There has been a recent thread at PerlMonks cov
It seems like... (Score:2)
someone should ask people what kind of books they would like to see...people not part of our incestuous little corner of the computing world. It seems like too many books are written by the author for the author instead of by the author for the reader. I've found few reasons to part with $40+ lately
Re:It seems like... (Score:3, Insightful)
That phrase pretty much sums up how I'm feeling right now. We can produce all the clever Perl books that we want and outside our little cosy world it means nothing. No-one cares.
I've spent so much of my time involved with the Perl community over the last 3 or 4 years that I started to believe that it was somehow important. And the truth is that it isn't at important at all to most of the world. Not even to most of the IT industry.
I've had a couple of t
Re:It seems like... (Score:2)
Well someone must care as at least a few books sell but, no, in reality most of the world doesn't give a damn not now, not ever. Computing, like plumbing, should be a fixture in every modern home thatonly gets noticed when something fails. It is less about people and more about where computing is heading. We engineers are always in the green room...not really in the audience and not front stage either...like a fuzzy netherworld.
Will anyone care about Perl6? I don't know the answer to that but who knows pe
I Am Not My Audience (Score:1)
That means there's a section on using perldoc and the CPAN and finding the real Perl and Apache and MySQL mail
I have said this before... (Score:2, Interesting)
I've met and worked with competent perl programmers over the years who have heard of comp.os.lang.perl.misc, if only because it was mentioned in the camel and llama. But they don't actually participate because they've seen what happens to newbies who ask questions.
These are people that we want in the community and we have successfully alienated them.
So, what to do? Let's be ambassadors for our community. Listen to peo
Re:I have said this before... (Score:1)
Very True.
I read somewhere recently but I cannot remember where that you can judge a man not by the way he treats his peers but rather by the way he treats those who he is superior to.
Most people need to get along with his/her peers and obvious there superiors but there is only really a moral compulsion to behave appropriately to those who you are superior too.
In this case it obviously even easier to behave poorly to people who don't understand the culture or the language of Perl because there is litt
Re:I have said this before... (Score:1)
The problem is that it is rare that anyone is superior to anyone else. I am superior to my children, certainly, but I am not superior to the moron who comes into clp.misc asking how to get the length of a string. I know more than he does about Perl, but I am not superior to him. And as such, I don't treat him as though I am superio
comp.lang.perl.misc and "attitude" (Score:1)
It's not as if this issue hasn't come up on clpm before. If I recall correctly, a common response talks about burnout. Some people feel responsible for responding to each newbie's question before they get a questionable, or wrong, or brittle answer from another newbie and leave thinking they just received the One True Answer (after all -- hey, it works!).
This is coupled with a large number of newbies who ask similar questions time after time, many of which are answered in some way or another in the FAQ, a
--
Esli epei eto cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
Aettot ibrec epesecoth, spakhea scrifeteis.