Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by gnat (29) on 2002.05.24 19:32 (#8816) Journal
    Commoditize the operating system. The operating system is a commodity anyway--or at least, it would be if Microsoft didn't insist on tying Office to it. A fully-featured Office for Linux would signal the end of Windows' dominance, and would be software Microsoft could sell.

    But won't Office just become commoditized? Not any time soon. Microsoft has a huge lead in stability and features. Anyone who has used Sun's ShitOffice knows just what a crock it is. What a farcical abortion of a piece of software it is. What a frustratingly slow and buggy bucket of shite it is. Ahem. Anyway.

    It's yet to be proven that open source builds anything but good infrastructure (operating system, server software). I believe that commercial software has considerable advantages over open source when it comes to responsiveness, usability, and other customer-centered development. I've seen very few innovations in end-user open source software, but a lot of copying of proprietary software innovations.

    --Nat

    • It's yet to be proven that open source builds anything but good infrastructure (operating system, server software). I believe that commercial software has considerable advantages over open source when it comes to responsiveness, usability, and other customer-centered development.

      How do you define infrastructure? A law firm would certainly include Word[Perfect] in that mix.

      I tend to look at it differently; it's about age and scalability. Operating systems and mail servers are old problems dating bac