Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • This post is just to prove that people hate change.

    I've followed the email dev threads, and overall, the amount of improvements and work in 3.x is impressive. Nice job all.

    With that said, I totally hate the new Test Summary Report format and 'skipped'. The old way was much more readable imho. Maybe my eyes will retrain with time. Who knows.

    From an 80 col command window:

    OLD:

    t\pod_coverage............................skipped
            all skipped: set TEST_AUTHOR to enable this test
    t\pod_spel

    • by Ovid (2709) on 2007.11.06 11:24 (#58853) Homepage Journal

      Thanks. I'm glad you like what we did, with the exception of the output.

      Regarding the output, we do take requests :) Also, it's not too hard to write your own view, but we do want to make it even easier in the future.

      Out of curiosity, which Catalyst version is that? I'm having trouble finding it on CPAN and I want to see those parse errors.

      So far I find Catalyst [cpan.org]. That's just a short POD file :(

      There's also Catalyst::Runtime [cpan.org] which appears to be the correct Catalyst, but I can't tell.

      There's also Catalyst 5.55 [cpan.org] which shows up in search results, but is old and unmaintained ... I think.