NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Not cooperating with Terrorists? (Score:1)
It's clear to me there's lots of evidence that Saddam Hussein was working with terrorists now, and more comes out daily.
I'm more comfortable with control of the situation whether than just guessing who and how the terrorists are being supported.
Since Saddam had not g
Re:Not cooperating with Terrorists? (Score:1)
$700,000,000,000?
Yeah, without 9/11 we'd probably still be buying Yahoo stocks for $100+
You really think you're safer now. Just because the terrorists can't stay in Iraq? Well, they're gonna move somewhere else. The US won't stop them with force before they either colonized the whole and I don't think that's anyone's plan.
Ok, I admit I think that is Bush's plan but his mom said she'd be mad if he did it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Not cooperating with Terrorists? (Score:1)
Remember it closed the US Stock market for almost a week. The World Trade Center was in the heart of the economic district. The insurance industry is still very shaky. Airlines and the travel industry in general took a huge hit. It did a great deal of damage to the overall economy.
Yes, I think I'm safer when we go out and actually do something about the problem rather than just
Re:Not cooperating with Terrorists? (Score:1)
'Something', in this case, has yet to be seen as effective. Simple economics dictate that -- currently -- it's cheaper for a 9/11 than a War On Iraq. It's cheaper for someone to become a banana republic dictator and crash a plane into a building than it is to build the building, or build the infrastructure that produced the building, etc.
If
------------------------------
You are what you think.