NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Perl needs better packaging (Score:1)
The value of CPAN is greatly diminished if we don't have an easy packaging mechanism. Many PHP apps are much easier to install than equivalent Perl ones, solely due to dependencies.
Re: (Score:1)
CPAN is complicated for a reason.
The answer is not to make packages stupider, it's to make the CPAN tools smarter.
Re:Perl needs better packaging (Score:1)
I don't see how bundling prerequisite modules with an application (e.g. Plagger) or large module does any harm. More disk space will be used, but in most cases that won't be a problem. Some may prefer to install modules separately, and I'm not seeking to stop that - I just want an easier way of distributing Perl apps.
Making CPAN tools smarter isn't really the solution IMHO. Bundling is faster (than downloading n packages off CPAN), and good for packaging "traditional", desktop Perl apps (yes, there are several). The idea of downloading off CPAN, at least in the current form where the latest version of the module is always retrieved, isn't very good from a configuration management and QA perspective.
I don't see how I was even remotely proposing to "make packages stupider". I'm talking about bundling modules together in such a way that they can be easily installed.
Reply to This
Parent