NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
You had me until the next to last paragraph... (Score:1)
You wreck your own point when you stated you can't discuss politics politely. If you want to convince somebody (me, for example) that you aren't just a raving Bush-hater, you have to act in a civil manner.
Now, I can't say that I'm any better in fact, since my own political rants tend to be just as angry, they're just a different set of positions. But I still say that the most convincing argument is the one delivered with passion, but still delivered politely and without coming across as anger or hatred (i.e
Re: (Score:1)
I posit that anger is not useful even for that. You want your judgement to be particularly level and unclouded when something matters enough to you to spur you into action.
Re: (Score:1)
Anger and rage are different. (For an interesting diversion, find a theological treatise on holy anger. Just don't stop at Augustine's City of God.)
Re:You had me until the next to last paragraph... (Score:1)
Point taken.
Reply to This
Parent