NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Which win32 perl flavor? More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Strawberry (Score:1)

by jk2addict (4946)

Definitely better than AS. Compile environment included. No futzing w/PPM and VC/.NET1/NET2 libs and compilers.
- Re:Strawberry (Score:1)
  
  by jordan (120) on 2006.10.06 13:52 (#50840) Homepage Journal
  
  I'm torn about this.
  
  Is it better than Cygwin Perl? On the one hand, I have Cygwin fatigue. On the other, Perl is only half of the puzzle. I want bash, too.
  
  Has anyone used Strawberry with MSYS bash? That might truly be heaven for me...
  
  Reply to This
  
  Parent
  - Re: (Score:1)
    
    by tsee (4409)
    
    I haven't used Strawberry from within MSYS bash, but I uses the MSYS shell to build libraries for Strawberry perl and wrapped those libs into .par's for installation into the Strawberry directory structure.
    
    We are considering inclusion of the MSYS shell in Strawberry, by the way.
    
    Steffen

Get More Comments

Reply

Disclaimer: I work at the reg*.{[hc],sym} like a novice alchemist:
I pour the blue liquid on the red liquid. If it doesn't blow up on my
face, I proceed to turn up the flame under the blue liquid, and so on.
I have very little idea of what I am really doing, I just like the
pretty colors :-)
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Navigation

Which win32 perl flavor? 3 Comments More | Login | Reply /

Please Log In to Continue

Strawberry (Score:1)

Re:Strawberry (Score:1)

Re: (Score:1)