NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Cocoa (Score:2)
QT [trolltech.com] looked interesting, but C++? You've got to be kidding.
Many years ago, I confess to purchasing a Motif [opengroup.org] programming manual. I started reading and never wrote a single line of code such was my revulsion.
Plus, what Aristotle said about Tk.
On the whole though, writing GUI programs makes me realise why I like the command line so much…
Re: (Score:1)
FWIW, I really don’t hate Gtk2 [cpan.org]. The docs can be a bit sparse at times, mind, but I haven’t found much to complain about in the framework as such, and the quality of the bindings is superb. They have had serious effort (both conceptual and labour-wise) put into them by a large group of people over a long time and the spit and polish really shows.
I have to say that wiring up event handlers and juggling widgets in a language that has closures and automatic memory management is so much nicer than
Re: (Score:2)
I played with the Perl GTK bindings briefly circa early 2002. I recall that I really liked them, but at the time I think I was a Gnome fanboy. I had a graduate-level machine learning class in which we were using matlab as our standing programming and GUI tool, and I was actually planning on using Perl, PDL, and GTK instead for a while.
But I remember zilch, and I realize I have very little basis for comparison amongst other GUI toolkits. My opinion that GTK was great, or that I really like Swing (I'm st
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Re:Cocoa (Score:1)
Note that I’m talking about Gtk2, the bindings for gtk+ 2.0, not Gtk-Perl, the bindings for gtk+ 1.2. The latter were far more rudimentary and have long since been abandoned, as has the underlying toolkit.
Reply to This
Parent