Slash Boxes
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • I'd like to see "Perl Enterprise Patterns" or something equally buzzword compliant lying on my desk.

    It would probably be an interesting read, but mostly I would just use it to subliminally fade the script/unreadable/toy/fringe aura Perl has in too many people's minds.
    • Funny you should mention this; Andy Lester and I were talking about it just a couple of days ago.

      We both want this book, for two main reasons:

      • We want a quality guide we can hand our developers and say "Build Perl applications this way."
      • We want to establish greater credibility for Perl with management, to show that "enterprise applications" can and should be built with Perl.

      In case anyone's interested, here are some notes [] that I wrote along these lines quite a while back.


      • Possibly one of the biggest problems I can see with a book like that is the average Perl developer. For Java, I think you can really get away with having developers less skilled than many and still have a bit of safety. Encapsulation, type-safety and checked exceptions are examples of constraints that simply don't exist naturally in Perl, but are the safety net for the Java programmer. This also means that the Java programmer must weave that safety net rope-by-rope or he's not allowed to do his acrobatic