Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • the most important advantages of git over other systems I've used (CVS, svn, svk) are
    • it's fast: I can download the complete history of perl in a few minutes and checkout any commit in seconds;
    • it doesn't (ever, in my experience) lose its mind, which all of the others have done for me on several occasions.

    I (now) like and use some of the other features, like cheap branches, easy rebasing and convenient publishing on github, but if I were looking for a reason to persuade someone to switch those would be my choice.

    • The thing is, I don't particularly care about those things.

      svn is slightly annoyingly slow, but not so much it's a problem.
      svn has never gone bad for me since I moved to FSFS.

      In exchange I get a number of other useful things I'd need to give up if I moved away.

      But all of that is not what this post is about. The bit I'm really curious about is the real world volumes of external contributions.