NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Is there in Java's truth no beauty? (Score:2)
This reminds me that on my harddrive I have the beginnings of an article comparing and contrasting Perl and Java's OO style. I wrote quite a bit of it with the intention of showing Perl developers why Perl's OO is a bit of a hack (I think I succeeded), but I kept finding myself saying "why isn't this easier to do in Java?"
Re:Is there in Java's truth no beauty? (Score:2)
Cost-effective (Score:1)
I would hope that talk was good, considering it would have cost us $1500.00 to see it. :-)
Re:Cost-effective (Score:2)
Casey West
Re:Cost-effective (Score:1)
It's not anti-Java (Score:2)
--
xoa
Re:It's not anti-Java (Score:1)
I'd argue that we sometimes bother, but we seem to do a better job thus far of hiding it from the end user.
I made a comment as "Both sides of the story" in that article by the way.. Most of the popular modules have a "Simple" wrapper around them. People rarely seem to bother doing this in the Java community.
Um... (Score:1)
Re:It's not anti-Java (Score:2)
java vs. perl (Score:1)