NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
2 things about browsers (Score:2)
2) Given a choice would you rather have to admin 100's of peoples desktops and having to patch their O/S regularly just to keep on top of frequent critical flaws in their browser or upgrade only the browser and less often
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Re:2 things about browsers (Score:2)
-Dom
Re:2 things about browsers (Score:2)
Patching windows is known to be something you shouldn't do blindly as it can break key business applications. Also the patches often interfere with unexpected and unexplained parts of the system and behaviour.
It is a lot better to be able to apply a patch to just the browser, particularly if you have different versions of the O/S running. In fact if you are running older versions of windows such as 2000 (which is likely) then you won't even get patches to fix IE.
Also most, even dangerous, vulnerabilities in microsoft products have fixes shipped once a month, rather than as soon as they are discovered as is the case with firefox, etc.
You can't just say, 'oh well as this other stuff needs patching too', not if you care about you systems running reliably and without large ammounts of downtime.
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Reply to This
Parent