NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
the same old story repeating itself (Score:1)
I am sick of this. When looking into the past, things are all very easy and so obvious. However, before September 11th, we weren't yet talking about the past but about the future. It's trivial to make forecasts for events that happened two years ago.
Specifically, why would the US administration need a successfully carried out terrorist attack to eventually go to war? Their reason (or pretext as some might prefer) would have been just as strong if the attacks on the WTC could have been prevented.
I wish less people promoted mere assumptions to facts.
Reply to This
Re:the same old story repeating itself (Score:2, Insightful)
Logically, it would have been. You're assuming that the court of public opinion operates using logic. It doesn't. It operates using fear and anger. Being attacked makes you want to strike back.
It's not so much that they didn't have a "good reason" for what they did -- it was as good as any other -- but the WTC attack aligned public opinion on the matter firmly in the pos
------------------------------
You are what you think.
Re:the same old story repeating itself (Score:1)
I haven't yet read the article, but the abstract states that due to the coverage in the media a fifth of all Germans actually think that the attack on WTC was a complot by the American government itself.
That's a point where the publishing industry should re-