Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

My late homework assignment 8 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Are you looking for answers from only those who identify as
    Christians, or from the general public?
    • Both. I expect to get different answers from everyone.
      • I see. OK, here I go then:

        Any faith-based belief system is the triumph of wishful thinking
        over rational consideration of reality.
        • Hiya mary.poppins.

          That's a popular opinion held by many intellectuals (as I did for 15 years). Keep in mind though, that fine peeps such as Donald Knuth and our very own Larry Wall hold strongly to such "wishful thinking".

          It's sad that the anti-evolution flat-earth Scopes and Gallileo Trials type stuff gets all the attention. There's no shortage of rational, thinking, extremely intelligent men and women for whom faith is a major part of their lives.
          • I am aware that wishful thinking can be very appealing to
            even very intelligent people. Just because one is able to
            think, does not imply that one wants to think.

            Here's definition #2 from the American Heritage Dictionary,
            of faith:

                  Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material
                  evidence.

            It's that definition of faith that I was referring to in my
            comment about "faith-based belief systems".

            When supernatural beings start showing up in verifiable
            ways, then I'll

            • Are you asserting that Wall and Knuth, for example, don't want to think?   That could easily be seen as pretentious and vain, eh.

              And what college philosophy professor taught you to think like him?   Er, I mean "think for yourself"?   ;^)

              On the other hand, phat props to ya for the respectful way you asked about Muskrat's intended audience before sharing your thoughts.

              • > Are you asserting that Wall and Knuth, for example, don't
                > want to think?

                Apparently, they don't want to think about everything.

                > That could easily be seen as pretentious and vain, eh.

                Appeals to authority *really* don't have any effect on me.

                > And what college philosophy professor taught you to think
                > like him? Er, I mean "think for yourself"? ;^)

                Yeah, whatever, I didn't take any philosophy in college.
                I've been a rationalist type for as long as I can remember.
                You know, asking the paren
                • Hmmm... not sure what authority it sounded like I was appealing to, but I assure you none was intended.

                  And I offer my apologies for (incorrectly) assuming the bit about a college philosophy course.   My bad.   Although I do share your rationalist mindset.

                  In your readings on history, do you recall any mention of impetus from numerous Christians in:

                  • bringing about the abolition of slavery in the US
                  • working for widespread literacy in the west, when such was unheard of
                  • racial equality in
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.