NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Planet, Plagger, Perl (Score:1)
That brief comparison aside, I don't understand why Perl people insist on Perl tools. I think that's an NIH attitude that is frequently unproductive. Unless you plan to do heavy hacking, you should use the easiest tool that accomplishes the job.
Finally, you contrast the "openness" of your feed vs. Planet Perl. In both cases, one should use email to request the addition of new feeds. I've sent emails to the Planet Perl maintainers and have found them to be responsive. How is Planet Perl any less open in that regard?
Competition is a fine thing, but I think that you did diss Planet Perl in your comparison, whether intentional or not. Indubitably, your implementation is prettier (but I reaggregate anyway so I'll never see that prettiness).
Reply to This
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
While there is nothing wrong with using the right tool for the right job, which sometimes isn't your favourite tool, in this case a blog aggregator is something Perl should be good at and hence the Perl community in this case should eat it's own dog food an use a Perl aggregator...
-- "It's not magic, it's work..."
Re: (Score:2)
Of course! Because Planet is designed to do one thing while Plagger is not.
If you want the easienss of using Planet in Perl, Dave Cross' Perlanet [perl.org] is another option.