Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • It's not the players, it is SOME of the players, and the union.

    Most of the players do not use steroids, and most of them want to have much tougher rules about it, because they know this makes them look bad.

    And McCain has no business in this, though I don't mind him putting a little pressure on the union in this way.
    • Most of the players do not use steroids...

      Every article I've read, be it based on insiders, players or coaches, puts the estimate at about 50% for steroids, and over 75% for stimulants (amphetamines, etc). As for HGH, I couldn't say but any use is too much, and probably dangerous.

      and most of them want to have much tougher rules about it...

      I'll bet the pitchers are all for it. :)

      ...because they know this makes them look bad.

      If that were true, why has the Player's Union opposed this kind of drug te

      • by pudge (1) on 2004.12.07 21:02 (#36616) Homepage Journal
        Every article I've read, be it based on insiders, players or coaches, puts the estimate at about 50% for steroids, and over 75% for stimulants (amphetamines, etc).

        I've seen estimates vary from well below 10% to well above 75%, for any drug use. In baseball, I suspect the lower figures are most accurate.

        If that were true, why has the Player's Union opposed this kind of drug testing for so long?

        Because they oppose anything that takes away from players. There is a lot of disunion on this issue in the membership of the union.